|
College
of Engineering Accreditation
The appropriate accreditation commissions have
accredited all undergraduate programs in the College of Engineering at
Montana State University–Bozeman. The following engineering programs are
accredited by the Engineering Accreditation Commission of the
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, 111 Market Place,
Suite 1050, Baltimore, MD 21202-4012 – telephone (410) 347-7700:
The following engineering
technology programs are accredited by the Technology Accreditation
Commission of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology,
111 Market Place, Suite 1050, Baltimore, MD 21202-4012 – telephone (410)
347-7700:
The Computing Accreditation
Commission of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology,
111 Market Place, Suite 1050, Baltimore, MD 21202-4012 – telephone (410)
347-7700 has accredited
the Computer Science program.
EC2K Plan
Montana State University
College of Engineering
(Revised May 1, 2003)
Educational Objectives
The following Educational
Objectives apply to all programs within the disciplines of computer
science and engineering. Individual programs
will have program educational objectives that are consistent with the
needs of the program’s constituents and consistent with these guiding
Objectives. These Objectives describe what graduates can expect to
accomplish during the first few years after graduation.
College of Engineering graduates will:
|
|
I. |
Undertake professional careers in engineering or computer science; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
II. |
Assume leadership roles and employ effective
communication; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
III. |
Work in multidisciplinary professional teams; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IV. |
Engage in life-long learning, including
post-graduate education for some graduates; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. |
Contribute to industry and society, in Montana
or elsewhere, including involvement in professional and other
service activities |
Educational Outcomes
The following
educational outcomes apply to all programs within the disciplines of
computer science and engineering. Individual
programs will have program educational outcomes that are consistent with
the needs of the program’s constituents, consistent with these guiding
outcomes and consistent with the EAC/ABET Criterion 3. Outcomes describe
skills or abilities of graduates at graduation.
Graduates will:
|
|
1. |
Have appropriate skills in math, science, engineering, and/or computer
science with an emphasis on solving computer science and/or engineering problems utilizing fundamental
principals including engineering logic, traditional analytical
methods, modern software, and experimental apparatus. (consistent
with EAC/ABET Criterion 3 Outcomes a, b, e, k) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Have an understanding and philosophy that promotes professional practice
founded in technical integrity, ethics, social and environmental
responsibility, global awareness, and a recognition of preparing
themselves for continued education and independent thought.
(consistent with EAC/ABET Criterion 3 Outcomes f, g, h, i, j) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
Have the ability to assimilate course material from multiple courses,
design a system or process, communicate that design effectively
though verbal and written means, and work effectively on a design
team. (consistent with EAC/ABET Criterion 3 Outcomes c, d, g, k) |
Assessment/Evaluation Tools
College of Engineering
The College of Engineering will
utilize the following Committees/Instruments to aid in assessing and/or
evaluating outcomes and/or objectives:
|
|
● |
College External Advisory Committee |
|
|
|
|
The College
of Engineering will maintain an active external advisory committee to assist in
assessment and/or evaluation activities and to provide general
input. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● |
College Service Course Review Committee |
|
|
|
|
A college-level committee will determine and oversee procedures to review
college- and university-based service courses on a periodic basis. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● |
College Computing Committee |
|
|
|
|
A college-level committee will determine and oversee procedures to review
computing resources throughout the college. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● |
Departmental External Advisory Committees |
|
|
|
|
Each academic
department will maintain an active external advisory committee
(industrial advisory board) to assist in assessment/evaluation
activities and to provide general input on the various programs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● |
Interviewer Surveys |
|
|
|
|
The College
will survey campus interviewers of engineering students on a
periodic basis to evaluate success in meeting program objectives,
and to provide general input about how to make MSU COE graduates
more attractive to engineering employers. |
Individual Programs
All programs will, at a minimum,
employ the following assessment/evaluation instruments:
|
|
● |
Fundamentals of Engineering Exam |
|
|
|
|
All
engineering students will take the FE exam as a program
requirement. These data may be used to assess program outcomes as
well to compare MSU graduates with other schools using a
nationally normed exam. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● |
Student Interviews |
|
|
|
|
Department
Heads or appointees conduct interviews with students on a periodic
basis. These data may be used for direct curriculum feedback as
well as constituency input on program outcomes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● |
Surveys |
|
|
|
|
○ |
Employer Surveys |
|
|
|
|
|
|
▪ |
Each
department will survey employers of graduates on a periodic basis
to evaluate success in meeting program objectives, and to provide
general input on the various programs. |
|
|
|
|
○ |
Graduate Alumni Surveys |
|
|
|
|
|
|
▪ |
Each
department will survey recent graduates on a periodic basis to
evaluate success in meeting program objectives, and to provide
general input on the various programs. |
Assessment/Evaluation Activities and
Records
Individual
departments are responsible for determining success in meeting program
objectives and outcomes. Faculty must be involved in the evaluation
process through activities such as regular faculty meetings, regular
faculty committee meetings, and/or annual faculty retreats.
Processes for
assessing outcomes and evaluating objectives are conducted at the
program level to insure continual program improvement. Individual
departments and the college share in the responsibility to maintain
databases associated with all assessment/evaluation tools, to maintain
records of discussions involving assessment activity, and to document
actions taken based on data evaluated from the various
assessment/evaluation instruments.
ET2K Plan
Montana State University
College of Engineering
(Version 02 – 3 April 2003)
Educational
Objectives
The following
Educational Objectives apply to all programs within the disciplines of engineering technology. Individual
programs will have program educational objectives that are consistent
with the needs of the program’s constituents and consistent with these
guiding Objectives. These Objectives describe what graduates can expect
to accomplish during the first few years after graduation.
College of
Engineering graduates will:
|
|
I. |
Undertake professional careers in
engineering technology and closely related fields; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
II. |
Assume leadership roles and employ
effective communication; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
III. |
Work in multidisciplinary
professional teams; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IV. |
Engage in life-long learning,
including post-graduate education for some graduates; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. |
Contribute to industry and
society, in Montana or elsewhere, including involvement in
professional and other service activities |
Educational Outcomes
The following
educational outcomes apply to all engineering technology programs within
the College. Individual programs will have program educational outcomes
that are consistent with the needs of the program’s constituents,
consistent with these guiding outcomes and consistent with the TAC/ABET
Criterion 1. Outcomes describe skills or abilities of graduates at
graduation.
Graduates will:
|
|
1. |
Demonstrate skills in math, science, and engineering technology with an
emphasis on solving engineering technology problems utilizing
fundamental engineering principles including engineering logic,
traditional analytical methods, current software, and experimental
apparatus. (consistent with TAC/ABET Criterion 1 Outcomes a, b, c,
f) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Demonstrate an understanding that professional practice involves not only
technical issues, but also a philosophy of technical integrity and
ethics, social and environmental responsibility, global awareness,
and life-long learning. (consistent with TAC/ABET Criterion 1
Outcomes g, h, i, j, k) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
Demonstrate the ability to assimilate course material from multiple
courses to design a system or process, to communicate that design
clearly, and to work effectively in a team environment.
(consistent with TAC/ABET Criterion 1 Outcomes a, c, d, e, f, g,
k) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
Demonstrate an ability to communicate effectively to professional
counterparts and the public. (consistent with TAC/ABET Criterion 1
Outcomes e, g) |
Assessment/Evaluation Tools
College of
Engineering
The College of
Engineering will utilize the following Committees/Instruments to aid in assessing
and/or evaluating outcomes and/or objectives:
|
|
● |
College
External Advisory Committee |
|
|
|
|
The College
of Engineering will maintain an active external advisory committee to assist in
assessment and or evaluation activities and to provide general
input. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● |
College Service Course Review Committee |
|
|
|
|
A college-level committee will determine and oversee procedures to review
college- and university-based service courses on a periodic basis. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● |
College Computing Committee |
|
|
|
|
A college-level committee will determine and oversee procedures to review
computing resources throughout the college. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● |
Departmental
External Advisory Committees |
|
|
|
|
Each academic
department will maintain an active external advisory committee
(industrial advisory board) to assist in assessment/evaluation
activities and to provide general input on the various programs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● |
Interviewer
Surveys |
|
|
|
|
The College
will survey campus interviewers of engineering students on a
periodic basis to evaluate success in meeting program objectives,
and to provide general input about how to make MSU COE graduates
more attractive to engineering employers. |
Individual
Programs
Technology programs
will, at a minimum, employ the following assessment/evaluation
instruments.
| |
● |
Fundamentals
of Engineering Exam or Constructor Qualification Exam (CQE) Level
1 |
| |
|
|
Mechanical
Engineering Technology students will take the FE exam as a program
requirement. Construction Engineering Technology students will
take the Constructor Qualification Exam (CQE) Level 1. These data
may be used to assess program outcomes as well to compare MSU
graduates with other schools using a nationally normed exam. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
● |
Student
Interviews |
| |
|
|
Department
Heads or appointees conduct interviews with students on a periodic
basis. These data may be used for direct curriculum feedback as
well as constituency input on program outcomes. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
● |
Surveys |
|
|
|
|
○ |
Employer
Surveys |
|
|
|
|
|
|
▪ |
Each
department will survey employers of graduates on a periodic basis
to evaluate success in meeting program objectives, and to provide
general input on the various programs. |
|
|
|
|
○ |
Graduate
Alumni Surveys |
|
|
|
|
|
|
▪ |
Each
department will survey recent graduates on a periodic basis to
evaluate success in meeting program objectives, and to provide
general input on the various programs. |
Assessment/Evaluation Activities and Records
Individual
departments are responsible for determining success in meeting program
objectives and outcomes. Faculty must be involved in the evaluation
process through activities such as regular faculty meetings, regular
faculty committee meetings, and/or annual faculty retreats.
Processes for
assessing outcomes and evaluating objectives are conducted at the
program level to insure continual program improvement. Individual
departments and the college share in the responsibility to maintain
databases associated with all assessment/evaluation tools, to maintain
records of discussions involving assessment activity, and to document
actions taken based on data evaluated from the various
assessment/evaluation instruments.
|