|
Test your knowledge |
Go to Section Four |
An overview of the normal skin healing process
Following an injury to the skin, inflammation occurs, bringing
platelets to form a blood clot, leukocytes to combat microbial
invaders, and mesenchymal cells that develop into fibroblasts. Then
the migratory phase begins, a scab is formed and epithelial cells
migrate across the wound under the scab. Granulation tissue is
formed as fibroblasts produce extracellular matrix and endothelial
cells form blood vessels. The migratory phase is followed by the
proliferative phase, characterized by extensive growth of epithelial
cells, fibroblast deposition of collagen fibers in random patterns,
and continued growth of blood vessels. Finally, the maturation phase
occurs where collagen fibers become more organized, blood vessels
are restored to normal, the scab is shed, and the epidermis is
restored to normal thickness. The simple description of wound
healing described above belies the fact that the process of wound
healing is extremely complex, involving hundreds of growth factors,
dozens of integrins, scores of enzymes, and over ten different cell
types.
|
|
Diagram of normal skin healing |
Absolute and
relative barriers to healing
A number of factors can impede
the healing process: low blood oxygen content, infection, lack of
perfusion, sustained pressure, patient malnutrition, systemic
disease such as diabetes and treatments such as immunosuppressants.
Though any one of these factors can become an absolute barrier to
healing, most often they are relative barriers to healing. For
example, infection (evidenced by pain, erythema, heat, edema and
tissue necrosis) can be an absolute barrier, but in most wounds it
is a chronic process, waxing and waning—in other words, a relative
barrier. Likewise, pressure can produce direct cell damage or impair
perfusion. If pressure in the wound area exceeds capillary closing
pressure, there is no blood flow, resulting in an absolute barrier
to healing. But pressures tend to be intermittent, making them a
relative barrier to healing. Typically all of these barriers occur
as relative barriers to healing, but they appear in combination,
compounding their effects.
|
How the healing
process is disrupted in chronic wounds
In the case of chronic wounds, the normal healing process is
disrupted in numerous ways. Fibroblasts isolated from chronic wounds show impairment
of synthesis, migration and proliferation. Endothelial cells from
chronic wounds are deficient in production of enzymes and growth
factors, and also are impaired in migration, proliferation, and the
formation of new capillaries. Similarly, keratinocytes are impaired
in their migration and proliferation as well as their ability to
synthesize cytokines, provisional matrix and basement membrane.
When matrix metalloproteases are evaluated in chronic wounds,
regardless of the etiology, and regardless of the age, gender, or
any other demographic factor of the patient, they all show an
identical biochemistry. Matrix metalloproteases are up regulated up
to 30-fold. There are certain patterns of increases in matrix
metalloproteases: matrix metalloprotease 8 (neutrophil drive) and
matrix metalloproteases 2 and 9 (macrophage drive) seem to be the
most upregulated. Of the four tissue inhibitors of metalloproteases
(TIMP),
tissue inhibitor metalloprotease 1 seems to have the most
importance. This is ubiquitously downregulated in chronic wounds,
producing a hallmark feature of chronic wounds—a very high ratio of
matrix metalloprotease to MMP to TIMP. Other findings in the
chronic wound environments seem to be secondary to the above
phenomena. There is a significant decrease in growth factors and
cytokines in general due to proteolytic degradation; there is a
reduction in functional receptors on the somatic cells making up the
wound bed resulting in their senescence; and there is a marked
increase in proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin 1, tumor
necrosing factor alpha and gamma interferon.
The presence of proinflammatory cytokines is interesting and may
be interpreted as a response to foreign agent. The innate immune
system is designed to be vigilant and reactive to foreign insults,
especially bacteria. Toll-like receptors (TLR) 2 and 4 are very
sensitive to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) material produced by
Gram-negative bacteria as well as teichoic acid, produced by
Gram-positive bacteria. When LPS or teichoic acid
stimulates the receptor, an exaggerated response yielding proinflammatory cytokines, interleukin 1, tumor necrosing factor
alpha and gamma interferon results. These are chemotactic and
reductive biochemicals which cause the migration and stimulation of
the innate immune system, leading into mobilization of cellular and humoral immunity.
|
 |
Host defenses relative to biofilm
Host defenses are robust, redundant and complex; this discussion
will be limited to a few of the immune system components in the
context of biofilm. The mammalian immune system is geared to provide
surveillance against any foreign invader, but especially bacteria.
The tool-like receptors are sensors looking for the fragments of
gram-negative bacteria (LPS) or gram-positive bacteria (teichoic
acid). Once these molecules are identified, a very potent
immune system response is generated. Through many intracellular
intermediaries, the dendritic cells (tissue macrophages) produce
proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin 1, tumor necrosing
factor alpha, interleukin 8, interleukin 12, interleukin 6 and
others. Collectively these are termed proinflammatory
cytokines, which are dramatically elevated in all chronic wounds.
The effect of these proinflammatory cytokines is to produce a
swarming of the area with neutrophils and macrophages. If this
defense system is in any way delayed, the individual bacteria have
time to attach to the surface and enter the biofilm mode of growth.
Toll-like receptors, along with antibodies, are important early host
defenses. Once biofilms form, antibodies no longer attach to
the bacteria within the microcolonies. Experiments in cystic
fibrosis using antibody stains show antibodies thickly crusted on
the outside of biofilm, but not within the biofilm itself.
Studies on white blood cell activity against biofilms have
demonstrated similar findings.
Laboratory experiments tend to suggest that antibodies, white blood
cells and other immune components are ineffective against biofilms.
However, clinical evidence shows that patients with biofilm-based
infections can sometimes heal. For instance, children with chronic
otitis media usually clear their ear infections with time.
Many chronic wounds, even when inadequately treated, will go on to
heal. Clearly there are host factors at work suppressing
biofilm. However, patients who remain impaired, whether due to poor
perfusion, repetitive trauma, poor nutrition, poor oxygenation or
white cell dysfunction will need help in suppressing the biofilm and
addressing other barriers that prevent wound healing.
|
|
On the next
page: Is there evidence of biofilm on chronic wounds? |
|
Test your knowledge |
Go to Section Four |
|
|
|
|